3 Comments

They do exclude jewish tribalism from being encompassed by the pejorative term. As with many things, its function is found in the exception.

Expand full comment

And also the sovereign.

Expand full comment

'As a result, Rufo, Kisin, Lindsay, Dave Rubin, Jordan Peterson, and the entirety of what has been called the “intellectual dark web”, are unable to formulate a serious and philosophically grounded response to Marxism. It is for this reason that these thinkers'

They are not thinkers. They are also not against ethnic tribalism. Rubin, Kisin and Peterson explicitly push ethnic tribalism. So, why do they oppose White ethnic tribalism? Well, we know the answer to that. They know if not intellectually, then intuitively, what game theory predicts about an organized tribe moving against disorganized, atomized individuals.

I think that, "putting the woke away", is not entirely accurate. I do think that AA is correct in some sense. It is being put away as the sovereign and the exception must now confront the consequences of the incoherence of their coalition. They must also confront that what worked to get others to bash and dispossess Whites in conjunction with a natural cloaking strategy has rendered the cloaking strategy problematic. On the other hand, the cultural genocide proceeds. The iconoclasm, the erasure in all media, the humiliation rituals and the detritus and patronage networks in all of the institutions remain. The Gollum lives.

In the end, Whites put down ethnic/tribal consciousness thinking everyone else would put it down. Ha! It was only exploited. We must now press the advantage and the mistakes of the "Intellectual" Dark Web that is probably awash in oligarchic money and networking advantages. That is to stop using the word Woke. Woke is tribalism and underneath it all is naked ethnic rivalry. The degeneracy is, I believe, an intentional distraction both for those who succumb to it, and for those who want to divert the conversation away from where it should be focused in its entirety. That is we should focus entirely on forcing any and all to call it anti-White. We must force them to answer why they espouse folkishness/tribalism for some but not for the targets of anti-White. Why is it okay to say one is just smarter but that others are not allowed to make the same claims.

The silver lining in all of this is that European man dropped his tribal identity and opened himself to any and all outsiders. Because of this he faces an eternal, existential peril. What plagued European man was his vast advantage over all the other tribes enabled him to engage in destructive brother wars and destructive vanities. Confronted with his awesome technological and martial prowess he retreated at once brimming with hubris and at once terrified of himself.

Now, across three continental homelands and smaller enclaves across the globe, he faces the same peril - the anti-White tribal alliance. Not only will his folkishness awaken, but it will awaken fully. He will be again an Englishman, an American, an Italian ... However, facing this peril and a colossal power behind it, he must unite into a deeper folkish kinship across the entirety of his kind. He will use his inventions/discoveries of DNA, anthropology, linguistics and history to unite as Occidental Man. So he will have simultaneously for the first time with no contradictions and causes for hesitation a potent local folk identity and an even more potent extended tribal identity across a burgeoning international imperium. The latter will prove the supreme bond across the entirety of the tribe out of necessity.

The more that Kisin, Rubin, Peterson, Lindsay et al try to suppress it, the more its virility will grow. What Caesar said!

Expand full comment