Of course my point is this ideological framing is inapplicable. Their policy was not ideological but cautious, reasoned, and pragmatic. Only those blinded by being beneficiaries of anglo-judaic mercantile political hegemony could fool themselves otherwise.
This is where the discussion begins: has this anglo-judaic hegemony done anything good for us? Should Anglos or Jews be trusted to hold authority going forward? If Anglo leadership tries to play the good guys by throwing Jews under the bus, should we really trust them? Should we trust anyone politically whose power depends heavily on maintaining financial control over continental European interests? Or whose power is dependant on making deals with or instigating non-Europeans against the same? Should we not put those English elites, colonial or otherwise, habituated to these things in their place so we can deal with broader geopolitical and cultural realities which threaten Europeans proper?
I am here because these overt questions are answered naturally whenever anyone undermines the liberal foundations for their treachery, as well as by continuing to build an intellectual basis which stands apart from them. Though the validity of political abstractions are always decided by their ability to, in effect, answer such tangible questions.
The National Socialists were centrists at best.
Of course my point is this ideological framing is inapplicable. Their policy was not ideological but cautious, reasoned, and pragmatic. Only those blinded by being beneficiaries of anglo-judaic mercantile political hegemony could fool themselves otherwise.
This is where the discussion begins: has this anglo-judaic hegemony done anything good for us? Should Anglos or Jews be trusted to hold authority going forward? If Anglo leadership tries to play the good guys by throwing Jews under the bus, should we really trust them? Should we trust anyone politically whose power depends heavily on maintaining financial control over continental European interests? Or whose power is dependant on making deals with or instigating non-Europeans against the same? Should we not put those English elites, colonial or otherwise, habituated to these things in their place so we can deal with broader geopolitical and cultural realities which threaten Europeans proper?
I am here because these overt questions are answered naturally whenever anyone undermines the liberal foundations for their treachery, as well as by continuing to build an intellectual basis which stands apart from them. Though the validity of political abstractions are always decided by their ability to, in effect, answer such tangible questions.